In it, gadamer attempts to illuminate the phenomenon of understanding. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, hansgeorge gadamer, sect. Is gadamers most influential work, his magnum opus. His magnum opus, truth and method, was decisive in the development of hermeneutics. Chapter one the commensurabilist endeavour of romantic hermeneutics in the literary archetype of the. With this concept, which we too shall have occasion to use, husserl is.
Hansgeorg gadamer 19002002 hansgeorg gadamer was a leading continental philosopher of the twentieth century. The first section of truth and method examines the question of truth in terms of aesthetic consciousness. Paul regan hansgeorg gadamers philosophical hermeneutics 287 approach to philosophical hermeneutics in his magnus opus truth and method 2004a first published in 1960. Gadamers hermeneutic concept fusion of horizons can also be used to extend this practice of critical inquiry into a sense of being and belonging, as joel weinsheimer notes in gadamers hermeneutics. Undoubtedly the concept and phenomenon of the horizon is of crucial importance for husserls phenomenological research. Truth and method is one of the two or three most important works of this century on. In examining the different experiences of truth, he aims to present the hermeneutic phenomenon in its fullest extent. Truth and method, is considered by some to be the major 20thcentury philosophical statement on hermeneutical theory. Inasmuch as understanding is taken to involve a fusion of horizons, then so it. In this book, gadamer established the field of philosophical hermeneutics. Pdf gadamers fusion of horizons and intercultural interpretation.
An introduction to the hermeneutics of hansgeorg gadamer with a special focus on the fusion of horizons. Every introduction to gadamers philosophy places a heavy emphasis on this phrase, and gadamers most influential critics tend to focus closely on the notion as well. Gadamers own thesis concerning the understanding and interpretation of texts and the meaning of the past is also presented. Fusion of horizons article about fusion of horizons by. Gadamer deals with such issues in his masterwork truth and method, offering resources through his understanding of the nature of texts and what he calls the fusion of horizons. The philosophical world has come to associate gadamers notion of understanding with a fusion of horizons horizontverschmelzung.
Gadamer on truth and method by jason burns duration. Hansgeorg gadamer stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Hansgeorg gadamer was born february 11, 1900 in marburg, germany. Hermeneutics, the art of interpretation, originated in biblical and legal fields and was later extended to all texts. For gadamer, such understanding is not a matter of forgetting our own horizons of meanings and putting ourselves within that of the alien text or the alien society outhwaite, 1985 and therefore not a matter of. The explanation of the above mentioned notions intends to legitimize gadamers central thesis that our understanding is never mere subjectoriented behaviour. Although on the first publication in 1960 of truth and method gadamer seemed to ploughing a lonely furrow, we ca n see that in retrospect his insights regarding the problem of. Fusion of horizonsanalysis of fortress besieged from. Taking as its central motif hansgeorg gadamers claim that the true locus of hermeneutics is the inbetween, this thesis defends gadamers concept of the fusion of horizons as radically interstitial against recent allegations that link his project to romantic interpretive commensurability. His importance lies in his development of hermeneutic philosophy. The fusion of horizons on knowledge and alterity sage journals.
An astonishing synthesis of literary criticism, philosophy, theology, the theory of law and classical scholarship, it is undoubtedly one of the most important texts in twentieth century philosophy. Other articles where truth and method is discussed. In his first mention of horizons in truth and method gadamer makes explicit his debt to husserl. Gadamer showed an early aptitude for studies in philosophy and after receiving his doctoral degree in 1922 he went on to work directly under martin heidegger for a period of five years. Ricoeur famously mediated the gadamerhabermas debate and advanced his own hermeneutical philosophy through a number of books addressing social theory, religion, psychoanalysis and political philosophy. We could see the fusion of horizons as a metaphor for the consultation process, a simple image of what happens in a consultation, with patient and doctor interacting and resulting in changed horizons. Introduction hansgeorg gadamers monumental contribution to the field of hermeneutics through the notion of the fusion of horizons in his truth and method.
Looking behind the selfconsciousness of science, he discusses the tense relationship between truth and methodology. He examines hermeneutics through the lens of language and assesses the issues language brings to understanding. Truth and method is a landmark work of 20th century thought which established hans georggadamer as one of the most important philosophical voices of the 20th century. This reddit is intended for academic philosophers graduate students, teachers, and researchers. Written in the 1960s, truth and method is gadamers magnum opus.
There are several ideas to explore on the way to developing our horizon as detailed by gadamer. Hansgeorg gadamer is the decisive figure in the development of twentieth century hermeneuticsalmost certainly eclipsing, in terms of influence and reputation, the other leading figures, including paul ricoeur, and also gianni vattimo vattimo was himself one of gadamer s students. The purpose of this paper this paper aims to articulate gadamers work in relation to reading, understanding and interpretation for health and social science researchers. Gadamer singlehandedly revived hermeneutics as a philosophical field with his many essays and his masterpiece, truth and method. Gadamer s hermeneutic concept fusion of horizons can also be used to extend this practice of critical inquiry into a sense of being and belonging, as joel weinsheimer notes in gadamer s hermeneutics. Hansgeorg gadamer built on this premise a kindred brand of philosophical hermeneutics put forward in his magnum opus truth and method tm which urges. For gadamer, an horizon constitutes ones worldview. Exploring gadamers truth and method final reflections. Gadamers mastery of material pertinent to his task has rightly been characterized as encyclopedic, but it is also suitably focused, especially through application of. There is an access of being in the same way as when, in a genuine conversation, something occurs to both partners that had not. He developed a philosophical perspective in his work truth and method and explained. Hansgeorg gadamer 19002002 was one of the most important german philosophers of the twentieth century. Those who preceded him tended to view hermeneutics through a prescriptive light.
On the contrary, it is always historically limited. In truth and method, gadamer redeploys the notion of our prior. Gadamers book, first published in 1960, represents a lifetime of scholarship, covering western philosophy from the ancient greeks to the time of truth and methods publication. Open access articles of merit and substance, including from the popular press, that directly engage with a philosophical issue or concern the philosophical academic community. I argue that in fact it is an excellent account of the successful resolution of dialogue, but only in light of a proper understanding of what gadamer means by horizon and how then horizons are fused. He explains that the fusion of horizons is made possible by the fact that the interpreter accepts the claim to truth of a text.
A process of the fusion of horizons in the text interpretation. The notion of understanding through fusion of horizons is enticing because it. In its standard application to statutory interpretation therefore, hermeneutics is a dialogic process. Horizontverschmelzung is a dialectical concept which results. Horizontverschmelzung is a dialectical concept which results from the rejection of two alternatives. Hansgeorg gadamers truth and method is a result of sixty years of reflection on the nature of the. The historicity of understanding and the problem of. Gadamers truth and method is treatise on his thoughts on hermeneutics. While talking to a person, we are trying to understand his horizon and in doing so, understanding takes place and that understanding is the fusion of the horizons.
Gadamers writing is difficult, therefore, it is important to get a worthy translation. The purpose of this paper this paper aims to articulate gadamer s work in relation to reading, understanding and interpretation for health and social science researchers. Paul regan hansgeorg gadamer s philosophical hermeneutics 287 approach to philosophical hermeneutics in his magnus opus truth and method 2004a first published in 1960. Gadamer deals with such issues in his masterwork truth and method, offering resources through his understanding of the nature of texts and what he calls the. Based upon the fusion of horizons of the hermeneutics proposed by hansgeorg gadamer, a leading german continental philosopher of the twentieth century, this article aims to analyze english version of wei cheng written by qian zhongshu and then cooperatively translated by jeanne kelly and nathan k. The third chapter addresses the relation between ontology and the historicity of understanding, as articulated by gadamer in truth and method. Exploring gadamers truth and method language as the medium of the hermeneutic experience. How gadamers fusion of horizons and openended understanding respects the other and puts oneself in question cynthia r. Gadamer, hansgeorg internet encyclopedia of philosophy.
Although gadamer has been criticized, on the one hand, for being a traditionalist and on the other, for embracing relativism, i. Gadamers fusion of horizons and intercultural interpretation. Gadamers philosophical hermeneutics makes a double proposal, the two aspects of which are implicit in the following sentence from the foreword to. Yet i argue in this article that, in the intercultural context, truth and method achieves only.
607 1001 254 822 489 796 158 1391 102 17 75 1200 743 1237 1440 1167 888 880 797 1454 292 1149 1394 895 425 594 1027 736 1165 1134 911 754 608 1593 678 1366 320 255 799 672 518 925 44